The discrimination between ventricular and
supraventricular tachycardia and the evaluation of their hemodynamic impact are
essential issues in the arrhythmia management. A new pacing device features a
tachycardia diagnostic system relying on simultaneous recording of the
transvalvular impedance (TVI) and the iECG, which is an integrated electric
signal derived by the whole set of endocardial electrodes. The iECG waveform is
sensitive to the pattern of ventricular activation, similarly to the surface
ECG. The TVI increases in systole and decreases in diastole, and the amplitude
of its cyclic fluctuation is an expression of the effectiveness of the pump
function. In order to test the value of these signals in the analysis of a
tachycardia, we have assessed the iECG and TVI modifications induced by
different SVTs and tolerated and non-tolerated VTs, during electrophysiological
studies.
In case of SVT, the ventricular component of the iECG
maintained the same morphology as in sinus rhythm. The peak-peak amplitude of
the TVI fluctuation was reduced to 66 ± 11 % of the individual sinus rhythm
reference, but the signal was present at every beat and showed a remarkable
stability (variation coefficient 0.19 ± 0.01). In case of a VT, the ventricular
component of the iECG was strikingly different than in sinus rhythm. Regular
TVI fluctuation was observed with tolerated VTs (peak-peak amplitude 74 ± 6 %;
variation coefficient 0.21 ± 0.04). In contrast, with non-tolerated VTs the TVI
amplitude was depressed below 40%, and the signal was virtually absent in the
event of very fast VT or VF.
Our results confirm that the iECG is a reliable tool to
quickly discriminate VTs from SVTs and that TVI can provide information on the
severity of the hemodynamic impairment produced by a tachycardia, with
potential clinical benefit in the follow-up of pacemaker patients. Furthermore,
the application of these signals in automatic algorithms of arrhythmia
recognition might improve the specificity of therapy administration by an ICD.
Credits: Claudio Pandozi MD; Franco Di Gregorio BiolScD; Carlo Lavalle MD; Renato Pietro Ricci MD; Sabina Ficili MD; Marco Galeazzi MD; Maurizio Russo MD; Angela Pandozi MD; Furio Colivicchi MD; Massimo Santini MD