Submit Manuscript    >>    Login | Register

Primary Prevention of Atrial fibrillation where are we in 2012?


Primary Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation where are we in 2012?

Quick View
Credits:

Massimo Imazio MD.
Cardiology Department, Maria Vittoria Hospital, Torino, Italy.


Corresponding Author:  Massimo Imazio, MD, FESC Cardiology Department, Maria Vittoria Hospital, Via Luigi Cibrario 72 10141 Torino, Italy.

Abstract

Drugs to alter or delay myocardial remodelling associated with heart failure, hypertension, or inflammation in the post-operative setting, may prevent the development of atrial fibrillation. Current experimental and clinical evidences support specific treatments for defined patient population (i.e. ACE-inhibitors and ARB for chronic heart failure and hypertension expecially with LV hypertrophy; statins, corticosteroids and possibly colchicine after cardiac surgery).

Key words: Atrial fibrillation, prevention.

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an increasingly common arrhythmia because of population ageing, the improvement in the survival of patients with heart diseases, as well as progresses in medical and surgical therapies for cardiovascular diseases. On this basis, the number of patients with AF is expected to reach 6 to 16 million by 2050 in the USA, while a similar proportion is also expected in Western Europe.1-3

The costs of managing AF is high. In a recently published systematic review on the topic, direct cost estimates ranged from $ 2000 to 14,200 per patient-year in the USA, and from € 450 to 3000 in Europe.4 These costs are comparable with those of other chronic conditions, such as diabetes. In the UK, direct costs of AF represented 0.9 to 2.4% of health care budget in 2000, and almost doubled over the previous 5 years. In-patient care accounted for 50-70% of annual direct costs, and in the USA AF-related hospitalizations alone had $ 6.65 billion cost in 2005. In another review, the overall estimated average annual system cost was $ 5450 (SD $ 3624) Canadian dollars in 2010 and ranged from $ 1,632 to 21,099. About one third of the costs were attributed to anticoagulation management. The largest cost was attributed to acute care, followed by outpatient and physician, and medications related costs.5 Costs and hospitalizations attributable to AF have greatly increased over recent years and are expected to further increase in future due to population ageing. On this basis, increased awareness and attention to AF prevention is warranted, especially for primary prevention, because while data from clinical trials have shown that preventing AF recurrence after it develops does not reduce major adverse events, such as stroke and death, and there is controversial evidence that it is possible to prevent AF recurrences AF primary prevention may be feasible and efficacious for specific patients groups.6-8 Moreover, it might have the potentiality to affect major adverse events more than secondary prevention. This seems not surprising since the underlying atrial remodelling may have gone too far to be successfully reversed after AF developing.8

AF is associated with hypertension, congestive heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and diabetes, that are also recognized risk factors for the arrhythmia.9 Specific conditions, such as cardiac surgery, are also associated with an increased risk to develop AF.10

AF involves a continuous remodeling of the atria with electrical and structural transformations. Specific therapies may have the potentiality to affect either the formation or the evolution of the substrate for AF (upstream therapies), providing the basis for the primary prevention of AF (Figure 1).11

Figure 1: Upstream therapies may affect the underlying disease (i.e. ACEi, ARB, statins), the substrate, the triggers (i.e. inflammation for statins, corticosteroids, and colchicine), and the remodelling process (all agents) preventing atrial fibrillation at different levels and mechanisms.


Several medications not traditionally considered as anti-arrhythmic agents (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors-ACEIs, angiotensin receptor blockers-ARBs, aldosterone antagonists, statins, n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids-PUFAs, corticosteroids, and colchicine) have been evaluated for the primary prevention of AF. Aim of the present review is to summarize current experimental and clinical evidence on the primary prevention of AF.

Inhibitors of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is suggested to play a key role in the development of AF through structural and electrical remodeling.

The key mechanism of antiarrhytmic action of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is related to the opposition of the arrhythmogenic effects of angiotensin II, including stimulation of atrial fibrosis and hypertrophy secondary to activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases, uncoupling gap junctions, impaired calcium handling, activation of mediators of oxidative stress, and promotion of inflammation.12,13

Four meta-analyses have shown that ACEIs and ARBs may be effective for the primary prevention of AF in the setting of heart failure. In these studies, the risk of new-onset AF in patients with chronic heart failure was reduced by 30-50%.14-17These data are consistent with experimental findings of atrial fibrosis as the leading mechanism of AF in chronic heart failure models and evidence of the antifibrotic effects of RAAS inhibition. There are no data if such effects may also reduce morbidity and mortality in the setting of chronic heart failure, and if ACEIs and ARBs may reduce the incidence of AF in patients with heart failure and preserved systolic function.18

The effects of RAAS inhibition on primary prevention of AF is less evident in hypertensive patients. Only one of four meta-analyses14-17 showed a statistically significant 25% reduction in relative risk of AF.16

The effects are less clear in patients with multiple risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, CAD, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral artery disease, hypercholesterolemia, such as those reported in the HOPE and TRANSCEND trials.19,20 In the setting of postoperative AF, RAAS inhibition was not efficacious for AF primary prevention.21-24

In a recently published meta-analysis, including 14 randomized controlled trials that reported on new onset atrial fibrillation (92,817 patients), and that compared at least one of the following drugs: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II-receptor blockers, and aldosterone antagonists with conventional therapy or placebo, RAAS inhibition compared with conventional therapy or placebo reduced new onset atrial fibrillation (RR=0.79; 95% CI; 0.69-0.90, p-value< 0.001). ARBs showed a strong effect in the reduction of onset atrial fibrillation (RR=0.78; 95% CI: 0.66-0.92, p-value=0.009), whereas results for ACE inhibitors were not as clear but likely show no effect (RR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.62-1:00, p-value: 0.05). Aldosterone antagonists, did not appear to play a role in the prevention of new onset atrial fibrillation (RR=0.77, 95%CI: 0.55-1.08, p-value: 0.21). Risk reduction was highest among heart failure patients.19

RAAS inhibition has been proven efficiacious for AF primary prevention in the setting of significant underlying heart disease (e.g. left ventricular dysfunction and hyperthrophy). Current European guidelines recognize the utility of RAAS inhibition for AF primary prevention in patients with chronic heart failure (class I, level of evidence A) or hypertension , especially with left ventricular hypertrophy "(class IIa, level of evidence IIa)".26

Statins

The exact mechanism by which statins may prevent AF is not fully understood. Statins may improve lipid metabolism, prevent atherosclerosis, endotelial dysfunction and neurohormonal activation, and exert anti-inflammatory and antioxidant actions.27

Moreover statins may antagonize the arrhythmogenic effects of angiotensin II by reducing oxidized low-density lipoproteins, regulate metalloproteinanses (MMPs), and in that way play a regulatory role in atrial structural remodelling. In animal models with sterile pericarditis and pacing, statins may attenuate atrial electrical and structural remodelling and reduce vulnerability to AF.28-30

Several retrospective analysis from RCTs and registries of patients with chronic heart failure have suggested a possible reduction in the incidence of new-onset AF.31-34

A 28-31% reduction in relative risk of developing AF has been reported in the Advancent registry31 and SCD-HeFT (Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial).32

However in the GISSI-HF (Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Insufficienza cardiaca Heart Failure) rosuvastatin significantly reduced the risk of AF only after adjustement for clinical variables, laboratory findings, and concomitant therapy (HR 0.820; 95% CI 0.680-0.989; p=0.038).33 There is also limited evidence for the role of statins in the primary prevention of AF in the setting of hypertensive patients and conflicting evidence in patients with coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndromes.18

More convincing data have been reported for the prevention of postoperative AF.

Several retrospective studies and RCTs,35-42 a systematic review,43 and a meta-analysis44 have reported a lower incidence of postoperative AF and a shorter hospital stay with statins. In the most recently published meta-analysis, 11 randomized controlled studies were analyzed and included with a total of 984 participants undergoing onor off-pump cardiac surgical procedures. Pooled analysis showed that statin pre-treatment before surgery reduced the incidence of post-operative atrial fibrillation (AF) (OR 0.40; 95%-CI: 0.29 to 0.55; p< 0.01), but failed to influence short-term mortality (OR 0.98, 95%-CI: 0.14 to 7.10; p=0.98) or post-operative stroke (OR 0.70, 95%-CI: 0.14 to 3.63; p=0.67). Statin therapy was associated with a shorter length of stay of patients on the intensive care unit (ICU) (WMD: -3.39 hours; 95%-CI: -5.77 to -1.01) and in-hospital (WMD: -0.48 days; 95%-CI: -0.85 to -0.11) where significant heterogeneity was observed. No significant side effects were reported. There was no reduction in myocardial infarction (OR 0.52; 95%-CI: 0.2. to 1.30) or renal failure (OR 0.41; 95%-CI: 0.15 to 1.12).45 The role of statins for AF primary prevention has been not definitively demostrated, more evidence supports their use in the setting of postoperative AF prevention. On this basis, the 2010 ESC guidelines on atrial fibrillation management gave a class IIb recommendation for the use of statin in patients with underlying heart diseases, especially chronic heart failure (LOE B), and a class IIa recommendation for prevention of postoperative AF (LOE B).26

Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids

Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) are natural constituents of cell membranes and regulate their fluidity, also modulating the activity of multiple membrane proteins. PUFA may counteract the arrhythmogenic effects of atrial stretch and have direct eletrophysiological effects on ion channels (i.e. INa, IKur, IAch, Ito, and ICa as well as the Na+/Ca++ exchanger).46-49 Additional properties include anti-inflammatory and antioxidant actions and the potentiality to regulate mitogen-activated protein kinase activity.50

Despite these theoretical premises and experimental evidences in animal models such as those in experimental sterile pericarditis models, where PUFA reduced the inflammatory response and the AF inducibility,51 epidemiological studies have given controversial results.52-56

In a recently published meta-analysis on the effects of PUFA for postoperative AF prevention, 3 RCTs were included in the analysis, enrolling a total of 431 patients. Overall incidence of postopJournal erative AF ranged from 24 to 54%. Pooling data, n-3 PUFA did not show a significant effect on the risk of postoperative AF [risk ratio 0.89; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-1.44; P = 0.63]. However, meta-regression analysis showed a trend toward a benefit from n-3 PUFA supplementation when the EPA/DHA ratio was 1:2 (Q model = 7.4; p model = 0.02) and when preoperative β-blocker rate was lower (Q model = 8.0; p model = 0.01).57

Table 1: Pharmacologic agents for primary prevention of atrial fibrillation


Thus, although the theoretical background and animal experimental evidences, PUFA efficacy for the primary prevention of AF still has to be proven and ongoing clinical trials will provide further evidence for or against their use in this setting.

Corticosteroids

Inflammation is a key mechanism of AF for some forms, especially in the postoperative setting.58 Animal studies have shown that corticosteroids may prevent electrical remodelling and inducibility of atrial tachyarrhythmias by attenuating inflammation in postoperative and atrial pacing models of AF, as well as sterile pericarditis models of atrial flutter.59-61 In these settings, use of corticosteroids was associated with C-reactive protein levels reduction, as well as reduced activity of endothelial nitric oxide synthase and myeloperoxidase.59-61

These effects were not reproducible with the use of ibuprofen, probably because of the effect of NSAID limited to inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase.62

Three meta-analyses have shown that corticosteroids was associated with a 26-58% reduction in the relative risk of post-operative AF as well as hospital stay by one day.63-65 Intermediate doses of corticosteroids were more efficacious compared with low or high doses. However, use of corticosteroids was associated with an increased risk of hyperglycemia, post-operative pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and gastrointestinal bleeding. High dose corticosteroids may also have a proarrhythmic effect.66,67

Also other epidemiological reports suggest that use of corticosteroids, especially at high doses, may be associated with an increased risk of AF.68,69

Nevertheless, based on available evidence, current European guidelines gave a class IIb recommendation for the use of corticosteroids for the prevention of AF after cardiac surgery (LOE B). 26

Table 2: Primary prevention of atrial fibrillation: recommendation from 2010 ESC guidelines86


At present, two large randomised controlled trials are ongoing to further clarify the role of corticosteroids for AF prevention in the post-operative setting or after ablation (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01143129, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00807586).

Colchicine

Colchicine is a potentially poisonous natural product and secondary metabolite, originally extracted from plants of the genus Colchicum (Autumn crocus, Colchicum autumnale, also known as the 'meadow saffron'). The drug has been used for the treatment and prevention of gouty attacks for centuries. More recently, colchicine has been studied and used in several other inflammatory conditions, i.e. serositis. Following the successful use in prevention of pericarditis in the setting of Familial Mediterranean Fever, the drug has been used for the treatment and prevention of isolated and idiopathic pericarditis.65 After non-randomized studies and initial randomised trials in acute and recurrent pericarditis, 66-69 the efficacy and safety of colchicine for pericarditis treatment and prevention has been confirmed in a recently published meta-analysis.75

In this meta-analysis, five controlled clinical trials were finally included (795 patients): three studies were double-blind randomised controlled trials, and two studies were open-label randomised controlled trials. Trials followed patients for a mean of 13 months. Meta-analytic pooling showed that colchicine use was associated with a reduced risk of pericarditis during follow-up (RR=0.40, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.54, p for effect < 0.001, p for heterogeneity = 0.95, I(2)=0%) either for primary or secondary prevention without a significant higher risk of adverse events compared with placebo (RR=1.22, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.10, p for effect 0.48, p for heterogeneity = 0.44, I(2)=0%), but more cases of drug withdrawals (RR=1.85, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.29, p for effect 0.04, p for heterogeneity = 0.42, I(2)=0%). Gastrointestinal intolerance is the most frequent side effect (mean incidence 8%), but no severe adverse events were recorded. The exact mechanism of colchicine action is not fully understood. Most of the pharmacological effects of colchicine on cells involved in inflammation appear to be related to the capacity of colchicine to inhibit the process of microtubule self-assembly by binding tubulin with the formation of tubulin–colchicine complexes, thus interfering with several cellular functions (such as chemotaxis, degranulation, phagocytosis) in leucocytes, thereby reducing the inflammatory response. Colchicine shows a preferential concentration in leucocytes, especially neutrophils, and the peak concentration of colchicine in these cells may be more than 16 times the peak concentration in plasma even when used at low oral doses, such as 0.5 to 1.0 mg daily.70,76

In the post-operative setting, colchicine used at low oral doses (0.5 to 1.0mg daily from the 3rd postoperative day for 1 month) is able to halve the incidence of several postoperative complications, including postpericardiotomy syndrome, postoperative pericardial and pleural effusions, and postoperative atrial fibrillation.73,77,78

In the COPPS post-operative AF study, 336 patients were included (mean age, 65.7 years; 69% males). Patients were in sinus rhythm before starting the intervention (placebo/colchicine 1.0 mg twice daily starting on postoperative day 3 followed by a maintenance dose of 0.5 mg twice daily for 1 month in patients >70 kg, halved doses for other patients or intolerant to the highest dose). Despite well-balanced baseline characteristics, patients on colchicine had a reduced incidence of post-operative AF at 1 month (12.0% versus 22.0%, respectively; P=0.021; relative risk reduction, 45%; number needed to treat, 11) with a shorter in-hospital stay (9.4±3.7 versus 10.3±4.3 days; P=0.040) and rehabilitation stay (12.1±6.1 versus 13.9±6.5 days; P=0.009). Side effects were similar in the study groups. 78

In animal studies of experimental sterile pericarditis, profound epicardial neutrophil infiltration, which promotes gap junction remodeling, has been detected. Areas with significant neutrophil infiltration displayed necrotic changes and had a lower abundance of connexins 40 and 43.79 Consistent with these observations, atrial myeloperoxidase levels (which reflect neutrophil/macrophage infiltration) were associated with conduction slowing and conduction heterogeneity in another canine cardiac surgery model.80 Colchicine attenuates neutrophil activation, endothelial cell adhesion, and migration to injured tissues.81 In addition to the potential effects of colchicine on neutrophil activation/migration/infiltration, colchicine may have relevant effects on atrial myocytes. Microtubules regulate the localization and interaction of adrenergic receptors and adenylate cyclase in caveolae (specialized lipid domains in the cell membrane).81 As a result, microtubules modulate the phosphorylation of calcium channels and likely affect the response of the atria to autonomic stimulation.82 Because autonomic balance is altered in the postoperative state, drugs that attenuate sympathetic activity (eg, beta-adrenergic receptor blockers or colchicine) or increase parasympathetic activity may decrease the risk of calcium overload–induced ectopy, which contributes to the initiation of post-operative AF. In that way colchicine may prevent post-operative atrial fibrillation with antiinflammatory and non-inflammatory effects.83

Although, at present colchicine cannot be recommended on the basis of a single positive clinical trial, there is growing evidence supporting its use for the prevention of several post-operative complications.84,85 Further clinical trials will provide further evidence for or against this use in the perioperative setting. At present, the ongoing multicenter, double-blind, randomised COPPS-2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01552187) is evaluating the efficacy and safety of colchicine given 2-3 days before surgery in order to prevent several postoperative complications (atrial fibrillation, post-pericardiotomy syndrome, and post-operative effusions).

Conclusions

UInterventions targeted at the substrate of AF and the modification of risk factors for AF may prevent the onset of AF in specific patient groups (chronic heart failure, hypertension with LV hyperthrophy, postoperative course after cardiac surgery). Such medical interventions include non-arrhythmic drugs that are able to modify the atrial substrate and specific mechanisms promoting the development of AF. Such treatments are also referred as upstream therapies and include ACE-inhibitors, ARBs, statins, PUFA, corticosteroids, and recently also colchicine (Table 1). These drugs may prevent or delay atrial changes, including fibrosis, hypertrophy, inflammation, oxidative stress, but may have also direct or indirect effects on atrial ion channels, gap junctions, and calcium handling. Experimental and clinical data have demonstrated that ACE-inhibitors, ARBs may prevent AF in patients with significant underlying heart disease (left ventricular dysfunction and hypertrophy), while statins, corticosteroids, and possibly colchicine may prevent postoperative AF. At present, specific recommendations on primary prevention of AF have been issued by the 2010 ESC guidelines on the management of atrial fibrillation and are reported in details in table 2.81

On the contrary, 2011 AHA/ACC updated guidelines on the management of atrial fibrillationconclude that there are insufficient data at this time to permit recommendations for primary preven tion of AF in populations at risk using dietary interventions, pharmacological interventions, or pacing or other devices. In the perioperative period, the American guidelines recommend betablockers to prevent postoperative AF for patients undergoing cardiac surgery, and amiodarone as appropriate prophylactic therapy for patients at high risk for postoperative AF.82

Disclosures

No disclosures relevant to this article were made by the author.

References

1. Miyasaka Y, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, Cha SS, Bailey KR, Abhayaratna WP et al. Secular trends in incidence of atrial fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and implications on the projections for future prevalence. Circulation 2006;114:119-25.
2. Naccarelli GV, Varker H, Lin J, Schulman KL. Increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation and flutter in the United States. Am J Cardiol 2009;104:15349.
3. Heeringa J, van der Kuip DA, Hofman A, Hofman A, Breteler MM, Lip GY et al. Prevalence, incidence and lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation: the Rotterdam study. Eur Heart J 2006;27:949-53.
4. Wolowacz SE, Samuel M, Brennan VK, Jasso-Mosqueda JG, Van Gelder IC. The cost of illness of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of the recent literature. Europace. 2011;13:1375-85. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
5. Wodchis WP, Bhatia RS, Leblanc K, Meshkat N, Morra D. A review of the cost of atrial fibrillation. Value Health. 2012;15:240-8. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
6. Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP, Domanski MJ, Rosenberg Y, Schron EB, Kellen JC, Greene HL, Mickel MC, Dalquist JE, Corley SD; Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Investigators. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1825-33.
7. Talajic M, Khairy P, Levesque S, Connolly SJ, Dorian P, Dubuc M, Guerra PG, Hohnloser SH, Lee KL, Macle L, Nattel S, Pedersen OD, Stevenson LW, Thibault B, Waldo AL, Wyse DG, Roy D; AF-CHF Investigators. Maintenance of sinus rhythm and survival in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:1796-802.
8. Savelieva I, Kakouros N, Kourliouros A, Camm AJ. Upstream therapies for management of atrial fibrillation: review of clinical evidence and implications for European Society of Cardiology guidelines. Part II: secondary prevention. Europace. 2011;13:610-25.
9. Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GYH, Savelieva I, Ernst S. Atrial fibrillation. In Camm AJ, Lúsher TF, Serruys PW (eds). The ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2009. 1069-132.
10. Mathew JP, Fontes ML, Tudor IC, Ramsay J, Duke P, Mazer CD et al. Investigators of the Ischemia Research and Education Foundation; Multicenter Study of Peri- operative Ischemia Research Group. A multicenter risk index for atrial fibrilla- tion after cardiac surgery. JAMA 2004;291:1720-9.
11. Camm AJ, Camm CF, Savelieva I. Medical treatment of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2012;13:97-107.
12. Goette A, Lendeckel U. Electrophysiological effects of angiotensin II. Part I: signal transduction and basic electrophysiological mechanisms. Europace 2008;10: 238 - 41.
13. Cardin S, Li D, Thorin-Trescases N, Leung TK, Thorin E, Nattel S. Evolution of the atrial fibrillation substrate in experimental congestive heart failure: angiotensin-dependent and -independent pathways. Cardiovasc Res 2003;60: 315 - 25.
14. Healey JS, Baranchuk A, Crystal E, Morillo CA, Garfinkle M, Yusuf S et al. Prevention of atrial fibrillation with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1832-9.
15. Anand K, Mooss AN, Hee TT, Mohiuddin SM. Meta-analysis: inhibition of renin– angiotensin system prevents new-onset atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J 2006;152: 217-22.
16. Jibrini MB, Molnar J, Arora RR. Prevention of atrial fibrillation by way of abrogation of the renin - angiotensin system: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Ther 2008;15:36-43.
17. Schneider MP, Hua TA, Bo hm M, Wachtell K, Kjeldsen SE, Schmieder RE. Pre- vention of atrial fibrillation by renin - angiotensin system inhibition a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2299 - 307.
18. Savelieva I, Kakouros N, Kourliouros A, Camm AJ. Upstream therapies for management of atrial fibrillation: review of clinical evidence and implications for European Society of Cardiology guidelines. Part I: primary prevention. Europace. 2011;13:308-28.
19. Salehian O, Healey J, Stambler B, Alnemer K, Almerri K, Grover J et al. Impact of ramipril on the incidence of atrial fibrillation: results of the Heart Outcomes Pre- vention Evaluation study. Am Heart J 2007;154:448-53.
20. Yusuf S, Teo K, Anderson C, Pogue J, Dyal L, Copland I et al. Effects of the angiotensin-receptor blocker telmisartan on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients intolerant to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2008;372:1174 - 83.
21. White CM, Kluger J, Lertsburapa K, Faheem O, Coleman CI. Effect of preopera- tive angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker use on the frequency of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a cohort study from the Atrial FIbrillation Suppression Trials II and III. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;31:817-20.
22. Shariff N, Zelenkofske S, Eid S, Weiss MJ, Mohammed MQ. Demographic deter- minants and effect of pre-operative angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers on the occurrence of atrial fibrillation after CABG surgery. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2010;10:7.
23. Coleman CI, Makanji S, Kluger J, White CM. Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers on the frequency of post- cardiothoracic surgery atrial fibrillation. Ann Pharmacother 2007;41:433 - 7.
24. Ozaydin M, Dede O, Varol E, Kapan S, Turker Y, Peker O et al. Effect of renin– angiotensin aldosteron system blockers on postoperative atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol 2008;127:362 - 7.
25. Khatib R, Joseph P, Briel M, Yusuf S, Healey J. Blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) for primary prevention of non-valvular atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Cardiol. 2012 Mar 13. [Epub ahead of print].
26. Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, Schotten U, Savelieva I, Ernst S et al. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Europace 2010; 12:1360 - 420.
27. Savelieva I, Kourliouros A, Camm J. Primary and secondary prevention of atrial fibrillation with statins and polyunsaturated fatty acids: review of evidence and clinical relevance. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 2010;381:1 - 13.
28. Kumagai K, Nakashima H, Saku K. The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor atorvastatin prevents atrial fibrillation by inhibiting inflammation in a canine sterile pericarditis model. Cardiovasc Res 2004;62:105 - 11
29. Shiroshita-Takeshita A, Schram G, Lavoie J, Nattel S. The effect of simvastatin and antioxidant vitamins on atrial fibrillation-promotion by atrial tachycardia remodeling in dogs. Circulation 2004;110:2313-9.
30. Shiroshita-Takeshita A, Brundel BJ, Burstein B, Leung TK, Mitamura H, Ogawa S et al. Effects of simvastatin on the development of the atrial fibrillation substrate in dogs with congestive heart failure. Cardiovasc Res 2007;74:75-84.
31. Hanna IR, Heeke B, Bush H, Brosius L, King-Hageman D, Dudley SC Jr et al. Lipid-lowering drug use is associated with reduced prevalence of atrial fibrillation in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Heart Rhythm 2006;3: 881-6.
32. Dickinson MG, Hellkamp AS, Ip JH, Anderson J, Johnson GW, Singh SN et al. Statin therapy was associated with reduced atrial fibrillation and flutter in heart failure patients in SCD-HEFT. Heart Rhythm 2006;3:S49 (Abstract). 33. Maggioni AP, Fabbri G, Lucci D, Marchioli R, Franzosi MG, Latini R et al. Effects of rosuvastatin on atrial fibrillation occurrence: ancillary results of the GISSI-HF trial. Eur Heart J 2009;19:2327-36.
34. Kotlewski A, Liu ILA, Khan SS, Shen AY, Brar SS. Prevalence of atrial fibrillation and flutter by different HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and doses in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:61A (Abstract).
35. Dotani MI, Elnicki DM, Jain AC, Gibson CM. Effect of preoperative statin therapy and cardiac outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 2000;86: 1128-30.
36. Marin F, Pascual DA, Roldan V, Arribas JM, Ahumada M, Tornel PL et al. Statins and postoperative risk of atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 2006;97:55-60.
37. Lertsburapa K, White CM, Kluger J, Faheem O, Hammond J, Coleman CI. Pre- operative statins for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiothoracic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:405-11.
38. Kourliouros A, De Souza A, Roberts N, Marciniak A, Tsiouris A, Valencia O et al. Dose-related effect of statins on atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:1515-20.
39. Mithani S, Akbar MS, Johnson DJ, Kuskowski M, Apple KK, Bonawitz-Conlin J et al. Dose dependent effect of statins on postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery among patients treated with beta blockers. J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;4:61.
40. Kourliouros A, Valencia O, Tavakkoli Hosseini M, Mayr M, Sarsam M, Camm J et al. Preoperative high-dose atorvastatin for prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;141:244-8.
41. Patti G, Chello M, Candura D, Pasceri V, D'Ambrosio A, Covino E et al. Ran- domized trial of atorvastatin for reduction of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: results of the ARMYDA-3 (Atorvastatin for Reduction of MYocardial Dysrhythmia After cardiac surgery) study. Circula- tion 2006;114:1455-61.
42. Song YB, On YK, Kim JH, Shin DH, Kim JS, Sung J et al. The effects of atorvastatin on the occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Am Heart J 2008;156:373 e9-16.
43. Liakopoulos OJ, Choi YH, Kuhn EW, Wittwer T, Borys M, Madershahian N et al. Statins for prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic lit- erature review. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;138:678-86
. 44. Chen WT, Krishnan GM, Sood N, Kluger J, Coleman CI. Effects of statins on atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a duration- and dose-response meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;140:364 - 72.
45. Liakopoulos OJ, Kuhn EW, Slottosch I, Wassmer G, Wahlers T. Preoperative statin therapy for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;4:CD008493.
46. Ninio DM, Murphy KJ, Howe PR, Saint DA. Dietary fish oil protects against stretch-induced vulnerability to atrial fibrillation in a rabbit model. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005;16:1189 - 94.
47. Li GR, Sun HY, Zhang XH, Cheng LC, Chiu SW, Tse HF et al. Omega-3 polyunsa- turated fatty acids inhibit transient outward and ultra-rapid delayed rectifier K+ currents and Na+ current in human atrial myocytes. Cardiovasc Res 2009;81: 286 - 93.
48. Boland LM, Drzewiecki MM. Polyunsaturated fatty acid modulation of voltage-gated ion channels. Cell Biochem Biophys 2008;52:59-84. 49. Xiao YF, Ke Q, Chen Y, Morgan JP, Leaf A. Inhibitory effect of n-3 fish oil fatty acids on cardiac Na+/Ca2+ exchange currents in HEK293t cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004;321:116-23.
50. Savelieva I, Camm J. Statins and polyunsaturated fatty acids for treatment of atrial fibrillation. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2008;5:30-41.
51. Zhang Z, Zhang C, Wang H, Zhao J, Liu L, Lee J et al. n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids prevent atrial fibrillation by inhibiting inflammation in a canine sterile pericarditis model. Int J Cardiol. 2011 Nov 17;153(1):14-20. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
52. Mozaffarian D, Psaty BM, Rimm EB, Lemaitre RN, Burke GL, Lyles MF et al. Fish intake and risk of incident atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2004;110:368-73.
53. Frost L, Vestergaard P. n-3 Fatty acids consumed from fish and risk of atrial fibril- lation or flutter: the Danish Diet, Cancer, and Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2005; 81:50-4.
54. Brouwer IA, Heeringa J, Geleijnse JM, Zock PL, Witteman JC. Intake of very long-chain n-3 fatty acids from fish and incidence of atrial fibrillation. The Rot- terdam Study. Am Heart J 2006;151:857-62.
55. Aizer A, Gaziano JM, Manson JE, Buring JE, Albert CM. Relationship between fish consumption and the development of atrial fibrillation in men. Heart Rhythm 2006;3:S5 (Abstract).
56. Berry JD, Prineas RJ, van Horn L, Passman R, Larson J, Goldberger J et al. Dietary fish intake and incident atrial fibrillation (from the Women's Health Initiative). Am J Cardiol 2010;105:844-8. 57. Benedetto U, Angeloni E, Melina G, Danesi TH, Di Bartolomeo R, Lechiancole A, Refice S, Roscitano A, Comito C, Sinatra R. n-3 Polyunsaturated fatty acids for the prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2011 Aug 5. [Epub ahead of print].
58. Kourliouros A, Savelieva I, Kiotsekoglou A, Jahangiri M, Camm J. Current con- cepts in the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J 2009;157:243-52.
59. Shii Y, Schuessler RB, Gaynor SL, Yamada K, Fu AS, Boineau JP et al. Inflammation of atrium after cardiac surgery is associated with inhomogeneity of atrial conduction and atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2005;111:2881-8.
60. Shiroshita-Takeshita A, Brundel BJ, Lavoie J, Nattel S. Prednisone prevents atrial fibrillation promotion by atrial tachycardia remodeling in dogs. Cardiovasc Res 2006;69:865-75.
61. Goldstein RN, Ryu K, Khrestian C, van Wagoner DR, Waldo AL. Prednisone prevents inducible atrial flutter in the canine sterile pericarditis model. J Cardio- vasc Electrophysiol 2008;19:74-81.
62. Shiroshita-Takeshita A, Brundel BJ, Lavoie J, Nattel S. Prednisone prevents atrial fibrillation promotion by atrial tachycardia remodeling in dogs. Cardiovasc Res 2006;69:865-75.
63. Marik PE, Fromm R. The efficacy and dosage effect of corticosteroids for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review. J Crit Care 2009;24:458-463.
64. Ho KM, Tan JA. Benefits and risks of corticosteroid prophylaxis in adult cardiac surgery: a dose-response meta-analysis. Circulation 2009;119:1853-66.
65. Baker WL, White CM, Kluger J, Denowitz A, Konecny CP, Coleman CI. Effect of perioperative corticosteroid use on the incidence of postcardiothoracic surgery atrial fibrillation and length of stay. Heart Rhythm 2007;4:461-8. 66. Chiappini B, El Khoury G. Risk of atrial fibrillation with high-dose corticosteroids. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2006;5:811-4.
67. Jahangiri M, Camm AJ. Do corticosteroids prevent atri al fibrillation after cardiac surgery? Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2007;4:592-3.
68. Christiansen CF, Christensen S, Mehnert F, Cummings SR, Chapurlat RD, Sørensen HT. Glucocorticoid use and risk of atrial fibrillation or flutter: a population-based, case-control study. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1677 – 83.
69. Van der Hooft CS, Heeringa J, Brusselle GG, Hofman A, Witteman JC, Kingma JH et al. Corticosteroids and the risk of atrial fibrillation. Arch Intern Med 2006;166: 1016-20.
70. Imazio M, Brucato A, Trinchero R, Spodick D, Adler Y. Colchicine for pericarditis: hype or hope? Eur Heart J. 2009 Mar;30(5):532-9. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
71. Imazio M, Bobbio M, Cecchi E, et al. Colchicine in addition to conventional therapy for acute pericarditis: results of the COlchicine for acute PEricarditis (COPE) trial. Circulation 2005;112:2012e16.
72. Imazio M, Bobbio M, Cecchi E, et al. Colchicine as first-choice therapy for recurrent pericarditis: results of the CORE (COlchicine for REcurrent pericarditis) trial. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1987e91.
73. Imazio M, Trinchero R, Brucato A, et al; COPPS Investigators. COlchicine for the Prevention of the Post-pericardiotomy Syndrome (COPPS): a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Heart J 2010;31:2749e54.
74. Imazio M, Brucato A, Cemin R, et al; CORP Investigators. COlchicine for recurrent pericarditis (CORP). A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:409e14.
75. Imazio M, Brucato A, Forno D, Ferro S, Belli R, Trinchero R, Adler Y. Efficacy and safety of colchicine for pericarditis prevention. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. 2012 Jul;98(14):1078-82. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
76. Adler Y, Finkelstein Y, Guindo J, et al. Colchicine treatment for recurrent pericarditis: a decade of experience. Circulation 1998;97:2183e5. 77. Imazio M, Brucato A, Rovere ME, et al. Colchicine prevents early post- & operative pericardial and pleural effusions. Am Heart J 2011; 162:527–532.
78. Imazio M, Brucato A, Ferrazzi P, et al., COPPS Investigators.. Colchicine && reduces postoperative atrial fibrillation: results of the Colchicine for the Prevention of the Postpericardiotomy Syndrome (COPPS) atrial fibrillation substudy. Circulation 2011; 124:2290–2295.
79. Ryu K, Li L, Khrestian CM, Matsumoto N, Sahadevan J, Ruehr ML, Van Wagoner DR, Efimov IR, Waldo AL. Effects of sterile pericarditis on connexins 40 and 43 in the atria: correlation with abnormal conduction and atrial arrhythmias. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;293: H1231-H1241.
80. Ishii Y , Schuessler RB, Gaynor SL, Y amada K, Fu AS, Boineau JP , Damiano RJ Jr. Inflammation of atrium after cardiac surgery is associated with inho- mogeneity of atrial conduction and atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2005;111: 2881–2888.
81. Head BP, Patel HH, Roth DM, Murray F, Swaney JS, Niesman IR, Farquhar MG, Insel PA. Microtubules and actin microfilaments regulate lipid raft/caveolae localization of adenylyl cyclase signaling components. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:26391–26399.
82. Malan D, Gallo MP, Bedendi I, Biasin C, Levi RC, Alloatti G. Micro- tubules mobility affects the modulation of L-type I(Ca) by muscarinic and beta-adrenergic agonists in guinea-pig cardiac myocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2003;35:195–206.
83. Van Wagoner DR. Colchicine for the prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation: a new indication for a very old drug? Circulation. 2011 Nov 22;124(21):2281-2.
84. Mearns BM. Atrial fibrillation: Colchicine lowers postoperative AF risk. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011 Dec 6;9(2):67. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2011.196. 85. Imazio M. The postpericardiotomy syndrome. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2012 Apr 5. [Epub ahead of print].
86. European Heart Rhythm Association; European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, Schotten U, Savelieva I, Ernst S, Van Gelder IC, Al-Attar N, Hindricks G, Prendergast B, Heidbuchel H, Alfieri O, Angelini A, Atar D, Colonna P, De Caterina R, De Sutter J, Goette A, Gorenek B, Heldal M, Hohloser SH, Kolh P, Le Heuzey JY, Ponikowski P, Rutten FH. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2010;31:2369-429. Epub 2010 Aug 29.
87. Fuster V, Rydén LE, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA, Halperin JL, Kay GN, Le Huezey JY, Lowe JE, Olsson SB, Prystowsky EN, Tamargo JL, Wann LS, Smith SC Jr, Priori SG, Estes NA 3rd, Ezekowitz MD, Jackman WM, January CT, Lowe JE, Page RL, Slotwiner DJ, Stevenson WG, Tracy CM, Jacobs AK, Anderson JL, Albert N, Buller CE, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Guyton RA, Halperin JL, Hochman JS, Kushner FG, Ohman EM, Stevenson WG, Tarkington LG, Yancy CW; American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force. 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused updates incorporated into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2011;123:e269-367. Epub 2011 Mar 7



Biosense Webster
event date
Introduction to AFib
Ablation Specialist

View Ablation Specialists