Submit Manuscript    >>    Login | Register

Meet the Expert Doctor

Enter your question here:

Browse Questions Answered by Our Experts (OR)
 <<  <  ... 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 ...  >  >>
Answer:
I do not think that weight loss and exercise had a negative affect, AF just gets worse over time. The best strategy for recurrent AF depends on the acuity of your symptoms; however, if you are considering repeat ablation, it would probably be best to do so quickly as things certainly seem to be accelerating. Ablation procedures are more successful (and usually a lot easier for patients to tolerate) than they were 6 years ago. Many programs “discriminate” and do not offer ablation to patients older than some arbitrary number; many publications argue against this practice, as complication and efficacy rates in (well selected) patients > 80 years of age are the same as in younger patients. The decision really comes down to how severe your symptoms are. By the way, they probably are attributable to the AF (and not to developing heart failure)
Answer:
First of all, I don't think I would want to take daily medication for something that happens every four years. Infrequent AF episodes are perfect for "pill in the pocket" therapy - no medicine during most days, then a dose of antiarrhythmic drugs to terminate the episode of AF when needed. I think I would not do medicine or ablation at your current stage of symptoms. The question about which is better still needs to be formally answered. My opinion is that for people that have enough AF to warrant treatment, and have access to a physician / program that is accomplished at ablation, I would pick ablation over medications.
Answer:
This question, like many surrounding long term anticoagulation, remains controversial. I believe that this situation does not warrant treatment with coumadin, and the AF guidelines support this opinion. Many experts are saying that the availability of new agents may change this, but I disagree
Answer:
Ablation is always an option, but it seems that if you have been able to cope with AF for 24 years, why would you want to pursue that now? The decision about ablation is difficult for many patients, and a conversation by email cannot substitute for a visit to a thoughtful electrophysiologist. If you are interested in ablation at all, I would highly recommend such a visit
Answer:
I agree that metoprolol is unlikely to be helpful in this situation. The options are trying different antiarrhythmic drugs in substitution for Multaq or AF ablation. His bundle ablation is also an option for some patients, but mostly when the problem is a rapid rate during AF, which is not the case for your husband.
Answer:
In order to appropriately answer your question, more information is required with regards to: 1. Which size is your left atrium (maximum transverse diameter in four chamber view apical); 2. Which size is your left ventricle (maximum transverse diameter); 3. Which is the left ventricular injection fraction of your left ventricle? All these aspects are relevant to select the most appropriate interventional strategy in your case, although the previous experience with electrical cardioversion (both external and internal) makes the probability of successful catheter ablation quite unlikely. After investigation of your heart size and dynamicity, your cardiologist should be in the best position to take the most appropriate therapeutic option in your case.
Answer:
You do not appear to be a good potential candidate for catheter ablation of your atrial fibrillation. Did you try every antiarrhythmic drug combination to further limit or even eliminate your atrial fibrillation relapses? If not, full exploitation of those options should be undertaken. In addition, all information is required with regards to the size of your heart, of your heart chambers and of the movement of the myocardium walls. With all this information in mind, your doctor should be in the best position to take the most appropriate decision with regard to which therapy is most appropriate in your case, including the possibility of catheter ablation.
No.of Questions Asked: 1141
No.of Questions Answered: 1096
Biosense Webster
event date
Disclaimer

1. JAFIB and the invited expert reserve the right to decline any question. The question declined will not appear in the list of questions asked.

2. The questions or advice from the expert can not be considered as alternatives to your clinician's advice. This discussion is only for educational/informational use. Your EP doctor is THE person to advice you on treatment and management of your condition.

Feedback : Your suggestion on this new initiative are much appreciated. Please write to the managing editor(editor@jafib.com) about your feedback on "Meet the Expert".

Ablation Specialist

View Ablation Specialists